We are a local tax firm that has been practicing in South Florida since 1982. We are composed of CPAs, former IRS agents, managers, and teaching instructors.
IRS Appeals Experts + IRS Tax Audit, IRS Collection Cases
We are one of the most affordable and experienced professional tax firm in South Florida and dealing with the Internal Revenue Service. We have worked thousands of IRS tax cases since 1982.
You can feel free to come by our office is Skype us or call us for a free initial tax consultation. You will be provided with the very best IRS tax defense for IRS audits, IRS collections, or any appellate work.
We have over 200 years of professional tax experience and over 100 years of working directly for the Internal Revenue Service and the local, district, and regional offices of the Internal Revenue Service.
Our former IRS agents worked as managers and supervisors in the IRS tax audit division and we know every single way imaginable way to provide you the best possible tax defense if you are going through a IRS tax audit.
If you have received a letter from the Internal Revenue Service stating that you are going through an IRS tax audit, contact us today and we will walk you through the process of what to expect and how to prepare the best tax defense.
If you wish to appeal the findings of the local IRS agent, we can provide the best possible appellate tax defense for going forward.
Call us today for a free initial tax consultation and understand why we are considered the best IRS tax audit help the fence in South Florida.
Many people ask us how IRS determines their cases when cases get into the appellate process. below you will find out some of the standards they use in evaluating your case.
IRS Hazards of Litigation.
I am a former IRS agent and teaching instructor. I have over 40 years of experience with the Internal Revenue Service and in private practice. If you need help representation please feel free to call us today.
As a general rule after practicing over 40 years of tax experience, I have found I get a better result going to the appeals division. I feel that you have a more seasoned person looking at the case who is much more able to settle the case based on their years of experience. You will find the Appellate Division much more flexible.
Many times in the local office you do not know what you’re going to get from the field agent working the case. It is a lot easier many times to convince the appeals officer based on certain common senses. Many times a local office will see things black-and-white and the appeals agent sees things in the gray and are quicker to settle cases.
But keep in mind, you cannot have any frivolous arguments, you must have some sort of case before bringing it forward.
If you work a lot of cases that frequently go to appeals you can start building a reputation of a solid practitioner versus a scammer. It is best generally for your client and for your reputation to send solid work to the appeals office.
A LAYMAN’S LOOK AT THE HAZARDS PROCESS
I am attempting here to lay out a layman’s look at the hazards of litigation and what the appellate officer will look at as a case comes their way.
As a general rule, the appellate officer receives the entire case from the collection division or the audit division with all the notes and the entire case file.
Generally, the Appellate Division will get involved in the case from the audit or collection division in which the taxpayer is unsatisfied based on the result of the current field agent working the case and asked for a hearing in the appeals division.
The agent will carefully look at the case and then send out their appointment letter. They want to try to understand the case first before the appointment letters go out.
It is critically important for the practitioner of the taxpayer to respectfully and respond to all-time dated requests. You do not want to do anything to upset the appeals agent and their timelines in the handling of these cases.
Case files sent by the practitioner to appeals should be very organized, well documented and placed in tabs if necessary. Good case appearance is very important to the appellate agent can make their way through the case easily.
IRS management is very time conscious on cases and as a general rule, they do not like having overage cases in their inventory and many times both management and the agents are written up because of poor time management.
The appeals division is there to make a lasting final decision before the case could go to Tax Court.
The appeal officer does not want the case to go to court and they do their best to settle the case if in fact it can be settled on a reasonable basis. However,’s there are certain factors that the IRS appellate agent must consider before settlement.
If the case goes the Tax Court the IRS does not want to lose because it can alter future decisions and this can have a devastating effect on future cases going forward. If they lose the case it looks bad on the appellate agent, the supervisor’s management and the district in which the decision was ruled.
An Example:
The appellate agent looks at the case and based on the facts and circumstances. If feel they have an 8/10 chance of winning the case, many times they can offer an 80% reduction in the total tax. Before the agent sends out a letter offering a reduction, the case is reviewed with their supervisor to make sure this is consistent with the IRS overall goal so it does not affect future cases.
The IRS has certain categories or criteria that they use for the hazards of litigation.
I have put together 11 elements that they use in making their determination about the strength of the weakness of their case. Please remember this is a layman’s view so those reading this blog can understand how the IRS works these hazards of litigation cases.
I have deliberately not gone into any legal detail because this is just a brief overview of hazards.
Hazards of litigation categories
This list contains a majority of factors but not all-encompassing.
1. How would the judge view the facts of this case?
2. How much evidence would this hold inside a courtroom,
3. What is the credibility of the representation and the taxpayer
4. How well is the case been presented to the appeals agent that will be presented in court? Is the case well presented in well representative
5. Can the taxpayer meet the burden of proof effectively to convince the judge
6. If witnesses come into play are they credible and will they testify in such a case, can anything disqualify them
7. Has the taxpayer successfully shifted the burden of proof to IRS
8. Who does the appeals agent based on the aforementioned facts feel the judge will rule in favor of
9. How solid will the presenter of the taxpayer’s case be
10. Can the evidence of the facts be proven
11. Has tax law already existed in this case
What Does the IRM say about these matters
1. The Appeals mission is to resolve tax controversies, without litigation, on a basis which is fair and impartial to both the Government and the taxpayer and in a manner that will enhance voluntary compliance and public confidence in the integrity and efficiency of the Service.
This is Appeals’ general contribution towards achieving the Service mission. (See IRM 1.1.1, IRS Mission and Basic Organization and IRM 1.2.17, Servicewide Policies and Authorities, Policy Statements for the Appeals Process.) In further support of the Service mission, Appeals may defer action on or decline to settle some cases, under Policy Statement 8–47 (described at IRM 1.2.17.1.6), where:
A. required by other Headquarters Office-issued internal management documents, such as those suspending action on cases or those requiring coordination or control of identified matters with widespread impact; or
B. such action would produce a greater positive effect on voluntary compliance than would be derived from settlement or other action on the case.
3. A fair and impartial resolution is one which reflects on an issue-by-issue basis the probable result in event of litigation or one which reflects mutual concessions for the purpose of settlement based on relative strength of the opposing positions where there is substantial uncertainty of the result in event of litigation.
4. It is the experience of Appeals that thorough, reasonable, and objective consideration of all elements of a controversy leads, in a large majority of cases, to the resolution of the controversy on a basis agreeable to both the taxpayer and the Government.
The agreement is not possible in all cases, however. A taxpayer may not agree with Appeals conclusion as to the probable result in event of litigation or to the extent of mutual concessions required where there is substantial uncertainty of litigating result or may prefer to litigate for other reasons.
IRS Appeals Experts + IRS Tax Audit, IRS Collection Cases + Ft. Lauderdale, Miami, Boca Raton, Miami Beach, Palm Beaches
